SYNOPSIS
ROLL CALL
The Sacramento Housing and Redevelopment Commission meeting was
called to order at
PRESENT: Burns, Burruss, Chan, Fowler, Gore, Hoag,
Piatkowski, Shah, Stivers, (One Vacancy).
ABSENT: Coriano
APPROVAL OF AGENDA
Items 3 and 4 were moved to
the business calendar.
1. APPROVAL OF ACTION SUMMARY
SYNOPSIS
The action summary for
2.
Citizens
Comments
No
Citizen Comments
CONSENT
5. Acquisition
of
The
Commission voted to recommend approval of the staff recommendation for the consent
calendar item listed above. The votes
were as follows:
AYES: Burns, Burruss, Chan, Fowler, Gore,
Hoag, Piatkowski, Shah.
NOES: None.
ABSENT: Coriano.
Not present to vote: Stivers.
BUSINESS
3. La Valentina Development Site Exclusive Right to
Negotiate
Commissioner Shah asked about the
selection process for the La Valentina ERN.
The
Commission voted to recommend approval of the staff recommendation for the La Valentina Development Site Exclusive Right to
Negotiate. The votes were as follows:
AYES: Burns, Burruss, Chan, Fowler, Gore,
Hoag, Piatkowski, Shah, Stivers.
NOES: None.
ABSENT: Coriano.
Chair Shah asked about the community process for this
item. Celia Yniguez from the Community Development division indicated
that the Army Depot RAC voted to approve
the project. One member voted no, but the overall motion carried and the item was approved.
Commissioner
Stivers asked how this project fits in with the overall infrastructure needs
assessment for the area. He questioned
whether this acquisition is a higher priority than transportation or
circulation improvements. Celia said the
project will add to “quality of life” in the area and that the area is “park
deficient” per the City standard.
Commissioner
Burruss was concerned about the park location next to a school and whether this
will encourage kids to “hang-out” in the park.
Celia responded that acquisition of this parcel will allow police to see
into the park from
Gary
Beskeen, a single family home resident near the project, expressed concerns
about his property value and about the length of time that the construction
will take.
Commissioner
Stivers asked about the timing and financing for the construction. Chris Pahule
indicated that the financing is still being worked out and that they would
report back to the Commission in three to four months.
Commissioner
Burruss asked about the genesis of the idea for this park. Chris indicated that
this is part of the
Sandra
Samaniego, a resident near the project, expressed concern about the length of
time that the project would take, the possible displacement of long term residents
in the area, and the park’s proximity to the Verge Apartments and
Commissioner
Shah requested that, in the future, if there are dissenting votes at a RAC
meeting that these items not be placed on consent.
Jennifer Dawe with Holloway, Rasmusson and Molodonof - attorneys representing the
current property owner - indicated that the original intention was that the
property be developed as
condominiums. After discussions with the Councilmember and city staff, it became clear that a
park/detention basin was desired in this area.
Commissioner Burns and Commissioner Fowler both expressed
an interest in having additional
information brought to the Commission about this project, including the timeline, funding options, and
additional information about the concerns raised by citizens at the meeting.
Commissioner Burruss requested that the police sector
captain be consulted regarding increasing
patrols in the area and that staff report back on this issue.
The Commission voted to continue this item until the June
6th SHRC meeting so that SHRA
staff could address their concerns of the police plan for safety of the
residents in the area and dates
and plans for future development. The votes were as follows:
AYES: Burns, Burruss, Chan, Fowler, Gore,
Hoag, Piatkowski, Shah, Stivers.
NOES: None.
ABSENT: Coriano.
Public Hearing
6. Status of Redevelopment Plans and Five-Year
Implementation Plans for Nine Redevelopment
Project Areas – City Report
7. Status of Redevelopment Plans and Five-Year
Implementation Plans for Six Redevelopment
Project Areas –
Chair
Shah expressed the need for housing to complete a vibrant downtown.
A
motion was made to close the public hearing and to recommend approval of the
staff recommendation on the status of Redevelopment Plans and Five-Year
Implementation Plans for nine redevelopment project areas in the City and six
redevelopment project areas in the County. The votes were as follows:
AYES: Burns, Burruss, Chan, Fowler, Gore,
Hoag, Piatkowski, Shah, Stivers.
NOES: None.
ABSENT: Coriano
Downtown Housing Strategy Workshop
8. Lisa
Bates, Director of Community Development, presented a PowerPoint presentation
which reviewed the current downtown housing market, the Agency’s past
investment to support housing development, and the proposed future strategies
for continued investment to support a successful downtown.
Commissioner
Burruss thanked SHRA staff for the nice presentations and asked about services
for youth in downtown. Lisa responded
that staff is working with non-profits regarding this issue.
Commissioner
Chan expressed the need to focus on affordable housing and to bring back ethnic
diversity which is vital to a successful downtown.
Commissioner
Shah commented on the stated goal of having 20% of the units downtown be owner
occupied. Currently the percentage of owner occupied units in downtown is 12%.
He said that we need to continue to encourage as many for sale units as
possible in order to try and meet the 20% goal.
EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR'S REPORT
Chair
Shah appointed Commissioner Stivers to be the Commission’s Housing Element Subcommittee representative.
ITEMS AND QUESTIONS OF COMMISSION MEMBERS
Commissioner Burruss recommended that the
commission reference binders be updated with current information.
Commissioner Stivers asked if the issues at the
property in
La Shelle Dozier, Housing Authority Director,
responded that property issues have been addressed and they continue to monitor
the situation and have moved in new tenants.
ADJOURNMENT
As there was no further business to be
conducted, Chair Shah adjourned the meeting at
__________________________
AGENCY
CLERK